This document is based on the PEPr voting initiated by PEAR's Tobias Schlitt. The purpose is to define what to do with orphaned PEPr proposals.
It happens more or less often that
In these two cases PEAR QA should step in and try to get in touch with the specific proposers. If the proposer is no longer interested in the proposal, PEAR QA should search for a new maintainer for the package or the proposal should be deleted.
For these steps the following time frames are proposed:
Finished proposals should not be deleted, but marked as orphan. This marker should have the following content:
[QA-ORPHAN]
.